This blog is about Hawaii's status as an independent country under prolonged illegal occupation by the United States, and the history, culture, law & politics of the islands.

By Scott Crawford, Hana, Maui

Archive

Old Archives (Aug03-Oct09)

Blogs.com Top 10
Hawaii Blogs

Archives

Could Local Money Work on Maui?

MauiTime Article on local currenty from a couple weeks ago that I just got around to reading…

This is something I’ve been interested in for a long time, and some years back I attended a workshop with Lynette and several other folks about the LETS system version of local currencies. At that time we tried a bit to get something started but it does take a real coordinated commitment to get it going, to be accepted by enough businesses that it reaches a critical mass.

But Maui is probably a good sized community to try it out. It’s large enough that you could more easily get enough participation to make it worthwhile, yet it’s small enough that there is still a strong sense of community, lots of people know each other, social networks are strong. And that’s very important because the equity backing the currency is basically trust in your neighbors.

So anyway, I think this is worth thinking about in general, but especially among those who believe in the sovereignty of the kingdom.

Pre-contact, the Hawaiian Islands operated largely under a subsistence economy, with elements of a barter system. As the plantation era took hold, currency became necessary. In the latter half of the 19th century—before annexation and statehood—Kamehameha III presided over the creation of the Hawaiian dala. Like the American dollar, the dala was made up of 100 units, called keneta. Unlike the American dollar, the dala was relatively short-lived: in 1903, five years after annexation, the United States Congress “demonetized” it, and most of the coins were destroyed.

As Bumpy likes to quote Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild: “Give me control of a nation’s money and I care not who makes it’s laws.” While we work on the education and political and legal transition, the economic/monetary transition doesn’t need to wait for those. It can start with local currency, which can be done under occupation imposed law, and people can simply make their own choice to use it. Read the article to see the examples of other places, but it is quite legal to do.

The first question might be, is that legal? It is—with a few caveats. Creating and using a local currency—sometimes called complementary currency, in that it “complements,” but doesn’t replace, a national currency—will not unleash the dogs of the U.S. government, as long as it isn’t coin, isn’t referred to as “legal tender” and doesn’t look like U.S. currency.

Nothing says it can’t look like Hawaiian currency. If the U.S. doesn’t regard Hawaii as a country, then scrip that looks like Hawaiian currency would seem perfectly legal. (There’s mention in the article of Sam Slom’s attempt to reissue the dala, he’s not quite the right person to do it lol, but it just goes to show that it’s quite legal to do.)

This would serve three important purposes:

  1. It would help stimulate the local economy, just like local currency anywhere;
  2. It would stimulate curiosity and provide an opportunity to educate people about and win support for the Hawaiian kingdom; and
  3. It would be evidence of the de facto Hawaiian kingdom government effectively providing a government service to it’s citizens/residents, which is an important step in eventually restoring recognition internationally.

There are enough people/business who believe in the existence of the kingdom who would gladly use the money if it was done right, and maybe that’s how you first introduce it, but I see it being very inclusive, so people would use it just because of the benefit it provides, and you could reach out to lots of local businesses and entrepreneurs with the focus mainly on it as a form of local currency. But then as they use it they would start to ask about and identify with the kingdom. Believe me, there are lots of people on this island who would love to use a Hawaiian kingdom scrip if the system was set up well so they could believe in it and know if they accept this currency they can go spend it somewhere else useful.

Exactly how to do it and who can/will do it, I don’t yet know. Ideally, I would like to see this started by some coalition of “sovereignty groups” (for lack of a better term) along with cultural groups, who could use this as a common goal and all bring their networks into it. (It’s much better imo that it be started among the Hawaiian community and then through all their connections bring other locals into it, rather that starting among the haoles who might normally be the ones who might try this stuff but then may have a hard time getting Hawaiians/locals involved.)

And obviously, this is very complementary with a Hawaiian bank. The article mentions a bank that circulates one local currency, and a Hawaiian bank would take it to another level, but the currency can be started immediately, with no real legal/regulatory roadblocks, and maybe could help lead to a bank.

So… I think this is an idea worth putting out there for the new year…

No Akaka Bill Demonstration today

CALLING ALL HAWAIIAN PATRIOTS

What: No Akaka Bill Demonstration

Where: Near Obama Compound in Aikahi, Kailua – Corner of N. Kalaheo and Kailuana Plc. near bridge, location may change slightly, be flexible, look 4 banners and flags

When: Friday, January 1st, 2010, Set up at 4pm (need kokua),
Start at 5pm- till dark

Specifics
Main Message: No Hearings – No Akaka Bill! No Lahui Process, No Democracy, No Self Determination!
Msg 2 Obama: Not About us Without Us! – Bring Hearings 2 Hawaii!

Wear: Black and Red
Bring: Signs reflecting main message and bamboo torches

Brought 2 you by Hui Pu in collaboration with H.I.A.A. and KLMA
Contact: Andre Perez, Ph. 864-2336, Email – kanikapu@yahoo.com

Happy Old Year!

(as they say in Hana)

HawaiiTVBlog

Check out Kaleo Farias and his HawaiiTVBlog.com for some video blogging relating to Hawaiian independence and rights, including a “12 part series to confront and tackle the issue and topic of ‘Nationalism’ in Hawai’i until U.S. President Barack Obama confronts it and addresses it,” and a video of Auntie Dawn Wasson and her ‘ohana sharing about the current La’ie occupation for kuleana land rights.

Must watch video:

Ho`okahi Lahui Hawai`i

`Iolani Palace, January 16-17, 2010

Ho'okahi Lahui Hawai'i

Visit hookahilahuihawaii.org for more info.

“End US Occupation of Hawaii” greets Obama visit

AP story carried in Fresno Bee and KRSO Sonoma County among others…

President Barack Obama arrived in Hawaii on Thursday for a holiday vacation in the state where he was born and lived as a child.

The president, first lady and their daughters came to the island of Oahu for a more-than-weeklong vacation away from Washington. The Obamas have no public schedule and are expected to celebrate the holidays in private at a rented compound in Kailua.

A crowd of about 75 military servicemen and women and Hawaii politicians including Gov. Linda Lingle greeted Air Force One when it landed at Hickam Air Force Base. Obama took several minutes to greet military personnel and their families before getting in a black SUV for the ride to his vacation home.

People carrying cameras, dogs and children lined the streets along the road as his motorcade made its way to Kailua from the air base.

Some flashed the shaka or “hang loose” sign at the nation’s first Hawaii-born president. Others held placards wishing the Obama family a Merry Christmas.

A group of Hawaiian sovereignty activists standing near Pinky’s restaurant in Kailua spelled out “End US Occupation of Hawaii.”

Movement history, Akaka bill changes

A couple Akaka Bill related things today…

Jerry Burris has an commentary in the Advertiser discussing the revision to the bill that was passed through committee in the Senate version, and the differences between the two versions.

In short, the first version had Hawaiians enabled to negotiate self-government rights and powers with the state and federal government. The latest version set up a system in which Hawaiians might choose to negotiate away certain rights in pursuit of the larger good. For instance, it is likely that a Hawaiian “nation” would cede to the federal government certain powers of national defense.

How did this sea change come about? Some say the new, activist Department of Justice under the Obama administration was convinced by activists in Hawai’i that shifting the status of Hawaiians to something akin to an Indian tribe made good sense. Rather than negotiating for each and every aspect of sovereignty, the bill would accept sovereignty and contemplate Hawaiians granting back some aspects to overlapping systems of government. A side effect, not insignificant, is that this new version would set the Office of Hawaiian Affairs on the back burner as the default Hawaiian political entity.

Worth following Trisha Kahaulani Watson’s He Hawai’i Au blog at the Advertiser, where she has several recent posts related to the Akaka Bill. She published a long letter from Kawehi Kanui giving some history of the movement and her reasons for opposing the bill, a post on the anatomy of the bill and the amendments that Akaka made,  her stand on the bill which includes frustration with the process but not feeling like she can align with the radical right who oppose it. Her posts are generating some comments so go join the discussion.

Awakening a Sleeping Hawaiian Giant

Kuhio has a new post on his blog, Awakening a Sleeping Hawaiian Giant, that is worth reading, about the distinction between the national and native/ethnic definition of “Hawaiian” and the role of various agencies and organizations in expressing the will of Hawaiian nationals and facilitating the transition to restored independence.

Akaka Bill amended, passed committees; protests call for hearings

The Native Hawaiian Government Reorganization Act of 2009 (aka Akaka Bill) last week passed through the House Natural Resources Committee and Senate Indian Affairs Committee. But there are two different versions now. The Senate version was amended by Akaka which has caused a bit of a firestorm. Yesterday’s editorial in Star-Bulletin Akaka Bill Needs Airing kind of summarizes it…

Sen. Daniel Akaka surprised observers of the Hawaiian sovereignty bill bearing his name by injecting controversial changes that drew opposition from Gov. Linda Lingle, a longtime supporter of the bill. The congressional delegation needs to conduct hearings during the present holiday recess to clear the air and, if it can, justify the bill’s changes.
Akaka appears to have left many in the dark about the changes to the bill in the days preceding action by the Senate Indian Affairs Committee. Rep. Neil Abercrombie decided against presenting the changes to the House Natural Resources Committee, which approved the bill in its original form, following a blistering letter by Hawaii Attorney General Mark Bennett and an extraordinary rebuke of Akaka by Sen. Daniel Inouye.
In a prepared statement on the eve of the House committee action, Inouye said “events of the past 24 hours were totally unexpected.” He added that he was “very surprised” that the revisions “were not shared” with Lingle. Inouye did not say whether he had been aware of the pending changes.
The Akaka Bill has been regarded in recent years as one that would give Hawaiians sovereignty similar to that of Indian tribes, while retaining federal and state jurisdiction of civil and criminal laws. The changes just passed by the Senate Indian Affairs Committee would recognize the Hawaiian governing council as “an Indian tribe,” with all that comes with that status except legalized gambling. For example, many Indian laws rather than state or federal laws are enforced on their reservations.
[…]
Bennett, who received the changes on the eve of the House committee action from Republican committee staffers, also noted that the newly-changed Senate bill has a new term — “Qualified Native Hawaiian Constituent” — defined in six pages of the bill. No public hearings on that term have ever been conducted.

Here’s a few other links about the protest held last week and the call for hearings on the bill.

Opponents of Akaka Bill stage protest, accuse senator of ‘back-door’ tactics, Hawaii News Now, Dec. 14

Protest Against the Akaka Bill at Hawaii State Capitol Solicits Immediate Action, by Leon Siu, Hawaii Reporter, Dec. 15

Akaka Bill foes want hearing, Star-Bulletin, Dec. 15

UPDATE: Here’s the text of the amendment Akaka introduced, from his website.

The Prolonged Occupations of Hawaiʻi and the Baltic States

I highly recommend checking out Kuhio Vogeler’s blog and especially read his dissertation For Your Freedom and Ours: The Prolonged Occupations of Hawaiʻi and the Baltic States. Here’s the abstract:

The occupations of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania occurred during and after World War II, first from 1940 to 1941, then following World War II until the early-1990s, as the Soviet Union subsumed these countries within its territorial borders.  Similar to the Soviet occupation of the Baltic States, the US has occupied the Hawaiian Islands twice, first from January 16 to April 1, 1893, and then beginning on 12 August 1898. The US occupation of the Hawaiian Islands still continues.

This dissertation combines Power Transition Theory, Historical Institutionalism and Etzioni’s Power Classifications to examine the prolonged occupations of the Baltic States and Hawai‘i. Integrating the above theories with the inter-temporal application of international law, this study offers a comparative analysis of prolonged occupations.